kmip-interop-tech — archive

Updated results

From: Steve Wierenga <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 19:54:00 -0000

Hello Tony/all, HPE agrees with the raw reported results for ESKM. The summary graph is acceptable to us, but would it be possible to clearly indicate which are client results and which are servers? -- Steve Wierenga for HPE From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Cox Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 8:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [kmip-interop-tech] Updated results Hi folks, Attached is the updated results collection. If I have made any errors transcribing the results of our last meeting, please do let me know referencing the sheet and cell location. I have also constructed the graph I propose to submit to the KMIP TC containing only the positive results. Can you please confirm by email that you approve the graph for publication to the TC. As previously agreed, the raw spreadsheet is to remain confidential within the group participants and will not be published. Thanks again for your participation in this interop test. I'll also seek to update the cumulative graph of individual test runs completed in this test (as a sum of all vendor tests run) and publish that also however as that is a single value representing the test, I'll report that directly to the TC. For reference, there were approx. 22779 unique passed and verified test runs this time around. Cheers, -- Tony Cox KMIP Interop Lead [email protected]