kmip-interop-tech — archive

Motion regarding change of credentials

From: John Leiseboer <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 22:24:00 -0000

If the motion results in vendors being able to use either the original or the updated credentials – vendor’s choice – then I’m okay with that. Regards, John From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Thad Roemer Sent: Wednesday, 21 March 2018 3:42 AM To: Felipe Kendi <[email protected]>; Tony Cox <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Subject: RE: [kmip-interop-tech] Motion regarding change of credentials Thanks, Felipe. Just to clarify – the motions I presented are so that clients can use the updated credentials or test sheets if they are willing. Some were already using the updated credentials so forcing them to go back would probably cause extra work. I have also reverted (that’s a funny word) the credentials of the clients that have asked. Sorry for the issues on this. Hope this help get me a ‘second.’ Thanks, Thad Roemer Solutions Architect – US West 206-387-5521 [email protected] From: [email protected] < [email protected] > On Behalf Of Felipe Kendi Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 9:32 AM To: Tony Cox < [email protected] > Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [kmip-interop-tech] Motion regarding change of credentials Hi Tony, I'm not sure if we should take position in this email thread or if there will be a more formal process... Anyway, Kryptus has not started the tests with Unbound yet, so we are willing to use their new credentials and test sheets. Regards, On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:47 AM, Tony Cox < [email protected] > wrote: Hi folks, As most of you will now be aware, Unbound have raised a motion for a Special Majority Vote to use credentials other than those issued during the Connectivity Test Period and additionally to use test sheets other than those issued during the Connectivity Test Period. As a point of clarification, and following the TC Process, the motion will need to be seconded in order to trigger a Special majority Ballot. Please be clear that I am not asking for any party to second the motion, nor am I asking for any party to avoid seconding the motion. The intent of this message is to make a clear statement about the process. Whether or not an Interop Participant seconds the motion brought by Unbound is up to each Interop Participant to determine. As always, if you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thanks again, -- Tony Cox VP Partners, Alliances & Standards Cryptsoft P: +61 7 3103 0321 , US: +1 (650) 918 4307 [email protected] -- Felipe Kendi Desenvolvedor de Software KRYPTUS EED S/A Trust in Cybersecurity +55 19 3112 5000 www.kryptus.com ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service for QuintessenceLabs Pty Ltd. ______________________________________________________________________