kmip-interop-tech — archive

RE: [kmip-interop-tech] Updated Graphs

From: Mark Joseph <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 15:03:00 -0000

I don t remember have we had graphs like the last 2 in previous interop? Best, Mark Joseph P6R, Inc 408-205-0361 [email protected] On Feb 20, 2019, at 5:14 AM, Steve Edwards < [email protected] > wrote: I thought the point of the graphs was to provide a visual representation of conformance to the standard, not the number of products submitted for testing. -Steve From: [email protected] < [email protected] > On Behalf Of Tim Hudson Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 7:07 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [kmip-interop-tech] Updated Graphs On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 9:58 PM John Leiseboer < [email protected] > wrote: I don t think changing the labels makes the graphs any less misleading. Graphs 1 and 2 present exactly the same information and are more than sufficient. John I don't see how you can simultaneously claim the graphs are misleading and that they contain exactly the same information as two graphs that are not misleading. That position is simply not tenable. The graphs are completely accurate and represent the activity in the testing and are based on results we have all confirmed are accepted as accurate. For people that don't read the graph titles and the labels, or elect to read things out of context, Tony has updated the labels to make it clear what number of products are including in the total test results. Tim.