legalxml-courtfiling — archive

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Information to be tagged for redaction

From: System
To: [email protected]
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 15:05:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [Elist Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Information to be tagged for redaction




From: "Poindexter, Gary W" <[email protected]>
To: 'Allen Jensen' <[email protected]>, [email protected],[email protected], [email protected]
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 14:54:17 -0400






True and I agree without qualification.

With that said, there are applications (i.e. a justice integration engine,
message broker or court public access application) that will be given the
responsibility for eliminating/redacting content dependent upon the inquiry
source (for queries) or destination (a destination dependent
transformation). For this reason a tag or attribute that indicates
information that is to be redacted, with as much detail as to the conditions
under which it should be redacted, is important. This makes the business
rules more generic and more easily understood by receiving systems.

I would like to see a list of content classes of potentially redacted
information (I believe this could be extracted from this thread) and an
attribute/tag for these classes that indicates the content class such as
"protected juvenile", "protected witness", "witness family", "SSN", etc. The
fewer the classes, the fewer the variations in the business rules; the
greater the number of classes the finer the granularity of the business
rules.

gary