legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[John Messing]

So there is no further mistake, let me repeat for a third time that I favor the GTRI proposed person object as a superior technology to the linear relations of the present actor element. I also oppose the proposed response from Greacen Associates because it ignores a carefully stated invitation by GTRI to explain how a hierarchical inheritance model of a legal entity and person object could work. I think it is a reasonable request and a realizable goal, given some study and effort. I therefore oppose any rush to judgment, either by outright rejection or unthinking acceptance, of the GTRI proposal. I think it unwise to take a firm position on the GTRI person object as it has been presented without careful study and reasoned discussion within the TC under Oasis rules, regardless of any reasons that may be advanced to the contrary. Because I do not now choose to controvert any of the other statements or assertions of the prior posting, including but not limited to those about alleged agreements reached in Salt Lake City, one should not assume I am in agreement with any of them. Very truly yours. Best regards. John Messing