OASIS Open Mailing List Archives  ·  All Lists  ·  legalxml-courtfiling  ·  2002-09

legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]

Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Party or Actor


 MHonArc v2.5.2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [legalxml-courtfiling] Party or Actor


Either way, these tags are just for transmission of data between
systems, not presentation to the user.  Whatever any CMS chooses to term
the field data to their users is what they display to the user.  XML
Tags are just for the techies to know which fields to place all the
database data into that is being transmitted.  

Allen Jensen
Internet / E-Filing Development
Orange County Superior Court
(949) 476-4984


>>> John Messing <[email protected]> 09/22/02 10:21PM >>>
I prefer exactly the opposite. I would like to see developed a Party
object and a non-Party object. The first could include persons, property
(for American practice involving in rem and forfeiture actions), and
entities. The second could include witnesses, lawyers, judges, staff,
victims, etc.

Usually judges are interested first in who is and who is not a litigant
before the Court. Basic treatment and consideration is based upon this
distinction. The objects should be crafted accordingly.

Another equivalent term could be litigants and non-litigants.

Regards.



[Date Prev]  |  [Thread Prev]  |  [Thread Next]  |  [Date Next]   —  [Date Index]  |  [Thread Index]  |  [Month Index]  |  [List Home]