legalxml-courtfiling — archive

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object

From: System
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:54:00 -0000

MHonArc v2.5.2 -->

legalxml-courtfiling message

Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] JXDDS Person Object

From: "Lewis, Diane" <[email protected]>
To: "'Durham, Shane (LNG-CL)'" <[email protected]>,[email protected]
Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2002 13:45:18 -0400

agree.. with you Shane..
even if authors cannot attend face to face meeting... use of teleconference would be helpful during the meeting to clarify decision to be made.    

i provide some comment on this matter earlier based on the original drawing....

i will restate my thoughts after further study.. but for now the federal court and federal attorney perspective  from discussions with others would not support use of actor/role.... 

Note: the use of the term actor in current IT development is a term used in Unified Modeling Language by developers.. 

In development context system users are described as actors in specific system use scenarios ... the actor is motivated to use a particular system based on the user "role"(s)..  for example Case Clerk Actor can be filled by several different members of a USAO's paraprofessional staff.

the use of the tag will be expanded beyond transmission...... it must be mapped to or based on an existing business rule or recognizable justice community practice/procedure... to be easily identified by the justice community...   diane lewis usdoj/eousa