legalxml-courtfiling — archive

[christopher smith]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Charter revision second draft




From: "Smith, Christopher" <Christopher.Smith@jud.ca.gov>
To: "Winters, Roger" <Roger.Winters@METROKC.GOV>,       "Cabral, James E." <JCabral@mtgmc.com>,       "Dallas Powell" <dpowell@tybera.com>,       "Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <legalxml-courtfiling@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2004 11:46:50 -0700









I 
would also add to Roger's comment that Electronic Filing occurs in many 
industries outside of the courts (IRS, banking, etc).  As a result, I think 
we need to keep the word Court or Legal in the name somehow.  Speaking from 
a court point of view, I also think the first priority of this group should be 
determining standards for the flow of information into and out of the court for 
electronic filing.  
 
Nonetheless, California is facing the same issue that Dallas raises that 
vendors are looking for guidelines for sharing information between parties where 
the court is not involved.  I feel we should probably limit Blue to what we 
decided last week in Seattle but it would be helpful to document these ideas for 
post-Blue work.  Are we tracking issues such as this for future versions of 
the standards?  
 
Christopher