legalxml-courtfiling — archive

RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] IP issues involved in the Entity Seal and in other referenced standards

From: John Messing
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 13:44:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















legalxml-courtfiling message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] IP issues involved in the Entity Seal and in other referenced standards




From: John Messing <[email protected]>
To: "Clarke,Thomas" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2005 06:43:20 -0700






This is an extremely well presented set of options. My compliments to
the chair.

I prefer a combination of 1, 4 and 5. 

1, when we are not sure about the IP status,  4 when we are, and 5, but
only if we can get it, believe we can, or someone else already has
secured it for the larger community.

I also raise the question whether there is a difference when we refer to
a standard, like the DSS Entity Seal, or actually build upon a standard,
like ebXML or SOAP. If we refer to it, and we are not incorporating it,
it strikes me that our concerns should be lessened.

As for 5, I have heard but never researched, that SOAP is a standard
whose IP is licensed as though it is RF.

>