legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Please review 'Proposed Service Models for ECF3'
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Please review 'Proposed Service Models for ECF3'
- From: "Cabral, James E." <[email protected]>
- To: "Electronic Court Filing Technical Committeee" <[email protected]>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 19:03:42 -0700
Everyone, Another option we might consider on our conference call tomorrow is whether we should present the service messages (as they are virtually identical for both models) and both models to JTC that let them know that we are considering whether we should require one or more models in the specification and would welcome feedback from them. The feedback does not necessarily need to be collected at the JTC meeting. Jim Cabral James E. Cabral Jr. MTG Management Consultants, L.L.C. 1111 Third Avenue, Suite 2700 Seattle, WA 98101-3201 (206) 442-5010 www.mtgmc.com The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]