legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Newest version (0.2) of IEPD/WSDL bundle--and an issue
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Newest version (0.2) of IEPD/WSDL bundle--and an issue
- From: "John M. Greacen" <[email protected]>
- To: "'John Messing'" <[email protected]>,<[email protected]>
- Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2005 07:35:25 -0600
In Atlanta, the TC decided not to use the entity seal approach to digital signatures. We maintained our commitment to recommend use of digital signatures, just not in the form of the entity seal, which includes additional elements none of which we felt were relevant to our work. Next week at the face to face in Seattle, we will have to address the issue that Dallas has raised which I understand is whether the digital signature is contained in the message layer or in the payload. >
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]