legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Timestamps
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Timestamps
- From: [email protected]
- To: [email protected]
- Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:19:44 -0700
Robert, I have this follow-up question: How did the court decide to use Creation time? Do you think your implementation intentionally chose to use that value rather than the 'Submitted' timestamp ? Note: 'Submitted' is expressed in LegalXML 1.x for each document. As I use it for 'FileAndServe' customers, it represents the time when a filer authorized the filing to be sent. Or, perhaps the court through that 'Creation' just looked like the right value to use and no one really considered what it represented. Did anyone at the court consciously consider: "We definitely want to use the Creation time. And we definitely do NOT want to use the Submitted time" Maybe the court was unaware of the functional distinction? Or, maybe LexisNexis CA didn't provide both values in the XML, and so, the court had no choice to make. Eh? - Shane
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]