legalxml-courtfiling — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Final review of IEPD and WSDL for ECF 3.0
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-courtfiling message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [legalxml-courtfiling] Final review of IEPD and WSDL for ECF 3.0
- From: "Scott Came" <[email protected]>
- To: "Cabral, James E." <[email protected]>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
Jim and Robin, the intent is for the associations to have definitions as well.� The relationship between two objects may (usually will) have a definition different from the definition of either of the related objects.
--Scott
> Robin,
>
> That is an artifact from the script we use to generate
the HTML
> Documentation that occurs when an association between two objects does
> not have
documentation . However, if you click on the associated object,
> it will show you the definition for that
object.
>
> jim
>
>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]