legalxml-sc — archive

[John Greacen]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















legalxml-sc message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates




From: "John M. Greacen" <john@greacen.net>
To: "'Winters, Roger'" <Roger.Winters@METROKC.GOV>,"'John Messing'" <jmessing@law-on-line.com>,"'Bergeron,Donald L. \(LNG-DAY\)'" <Donald.Bergeron@lexisnexis.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:10:10 -0700






Title: RE: [legalxml-sc] re: Appreciation Certificates








I think signing is superfluous, especially
since you have already signed them electronically.













From: Winters, Roger
[mailto:Roger.Winters@METROKC.GOV]

Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006
12:49 PM

To: ; Bergeron,Donald L. (LNG-DAY)

Cc:
legalxml-sc@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re:
Appreciation Certificates





I'll
print them on glossy photo paper. Writing an inked signature on that isn't
always successful. They'll know they're signed - in spirit, electronically, and
they can get an autograph sometime when we're together if they want.

Roger 



-----Original
Message-----

From: John Messing [mailto:jmessing@law-on-line.com] 

Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006
11:48 AM

To: Bergeron,Donald L. (LNG-DAY)

Cc: Winters, Roger;
legalxml-sc@lists.oasis-open.org

Subject: RE: [legalxml-sc] re:
Appreciation Certificates 

If Roger
is willing to do the printing, then by all means we should give

them printed certificates. Roger:
Do you want to send me them when done

for physical signatures, or do you
have another idea? 

>