legalxml-sc — archive
Another item for the agenda
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->legalxml-sc message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Another item for the agenda
- From: "John M. Greacen" <[email protected]>
- To: <[email protected]>
- Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:02:55 -0600
|
John – An issue came up this morning during the ECFTC conference call that the Steering Committee needs to be aware of and may wish to discuss.
has released an RFP for a contractor to assist it in implementing ECF 3.0 and MTG is submitting a bid to provide those services. Consequently, there may be no need for us to spend Member Section funds to support . The TC decided that the TA would be provided to which ever contractor the County chooses and one purpose of providing the TA would be to ensure feedback for the TC on the implementation process.
MTG has agreed to disclose in its bid its status as the OASIS TA provider but to make clear that no OASIS funds would be involved in its provision of services if it were to be awarded the contract. Several of us were concerned that our choice of MTG as the OASIS TA provider might appear to other vendors or to the community at large to give MTG an unfair competitive advantage in the contracting arena; this agreement by MTG seemed to us to provide appropriate protection for OASIS from such an appearance or claim.
I suggest that Steering Committee members give some thought to this issue before the call tomorrow. Given these developments, should we reconsider the TA contract and expenditure? I also think that, while it might seem to entail a conflict of interest, we should ask to participate actively in this discussion, even though he probably should not vote on any proposal that may arise from the discussion.
John M. Greacen Greacen Associates, LLC HCR
505-289-2164 505-289-2163 (fax) 505-780-1450 (cell)
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]