legalxml-sc — archive

[Dee Schur]

Hi Roger, We (You and I) will reconcile the differences, and then I'll submit to Patrick. Did you see his comments? Can we respond to this concern? John G. I noticed that in the revisions you proposed for the LegalXML MS RoP the deletion of the last sentence of Section C and the deletion of Sections D & E. Please provide your reasoning for these deletions. Also, the language in the original Section F (Funding Model) used the phrase "Up to 40%" so as to allow for the negotiation of the funding percentage as part of the annual budgeting process. For example, in 2006, the LegalXML MS only spent approximately 33% of the budgeted expense funds. If in 2007, the LegalXML MS fails to spend the budgeted funds, then we (OASIS Staff & the Steering Committee) need to be able to negotiate a revised membership funding percentage, without having to revise the RoP each year. I do not have any objections to the other revisions you indicated. Patrick Gannon President & CEO OASIS +1.978.667.5115 x201 - office +1.978.761.3546 - mobile Skype: pgannon www.oasis-open.org