oasis-charter-discuss — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
[[email protected]: Re: IDPF TC filed]
Gentle ping on the below. Should I post this to the charter comments list? Thanks!
-----
Forwarded message from "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
-----
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 00:02:06 -0400
To: "Orr, Michael" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: IDPF TC filed
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 05:01:03PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 04:53:34AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2022 at 02:26:08AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 06:06:01PM +0000, Orr, Michael wrote: > > >
> Michael
> > > > > > >
> My deadline is up, so I filed the IDPF Charter (sent you a copy). I am still > > >
> hopeful NVIDIA will join intime so we can add you during > > > > > > >
> The charter-amendment period. > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > >
> Michael Orr NCNG Strategy & Roadmap Office
WW
Cell:
(669)265-5995 > > > > > > >
> Note: Dyslexic @Work. Please excuse my typos.
(Remember, Dyslexics are > > >
> teople, poo) > > > > > > > >
> > > > >
> Hi! > >
> I attempted to edit the document to comment there but the result is > >
> unsatisfactory, with the proposal split mid-word, and truncated. > >
> Afterwards I was also unable to remove the comment there. I did not > >
> realize the changes will be persistent without clicking "save". Sorry > >
> about that. > > > > >
> So I would like to propose adding the following to the Statement of Purpose: >
> So the final proposal would be this: > >
> This project aims to complement rather than supplant the work of
> the Virtual IO Device (VirtIO)
OASIS TC, providing for accelerated
> development by focusing exclusively on PCI Express hardware
> implementations and on the networking functionality. >
> While promoting VirtIO is not one of the purposes of this
> project, this project aims to allow reuse of all or parts of the IDPF
> TC deliverables by the VirtIO TC as applicable. >
> To facilitate and promote cooperation between the two projects, a
> representative of each IDPF TC member will join the Virtio TC in
> a (voting or non-voting) member status. >
> Contributors of material comments will also be
> encouraged to cross-post their comments to the Virtio TC
> comments mailing list. > >
> Makes sense? What's the process to propose this? Hi Michael, Still waiting for your answer on this - I'd like this resolved so there's no conflict with virtio and I can join the IDPF TC. Should I submit the change proposal through the public review capability now? > --
> MST
-----
End forwarded message
-----
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]