[OASIS Issue Tracker] Commented: (OFFICE-1404) Public Comment:Needs a scope statement (ODF 1.2 CD01)

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

    [ http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1404?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16066#action_16066 ] 

Patrick Durusau commented on OFFICE-1404:
-----------------------------------------

Michael,

Yes, yes, the abstract could be considered as a "scope" statement. 

The closer question being whether on a PAS submission are we exempted from the requirement that section numbering start with # 1 for the scope clause (our abstract). 

We are required to use ISO "format" for subsequent submissions but I don't know that anyone has ever raised that particular question. 

I will post a query to ITTF.

Patrick

> Public Comment: Needs a scope statement (ODF 1.2 CD01)
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-1404
>                 URL: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/browse/OFFICE-1404
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: General
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.2
>            Reporter: Robert Weir 
>            Assignee: Patrick Durusau
>             Fix For: ODF 1.2
>
>
> Copied from office-comment list
> Original author: "Alex Brown" <alexb@griffinbrown.co.uk> 
> Original date: 15 Mar 2009 08:55:21 -0000
> Original URL: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/200903/msg00128.html

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://tools.oasis-open.org/issues/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira