[OASIS Issue Tracker] (OFFICE-4102) 19.677.11 <table:operation> "implementation-defined"

[OASIS Issues Tracker <workgroup_mailer@lists.oasis-open.org>]

     [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4102?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Michael Stahl updated OFFICE-4102:
----------------------------------
    Resolution: as proposed

[office] Notes for ODF teleconference 10 May 2021:
Â
Â*Patrick:* +1 to Regina's comment on being consistent with <table:highlighted-range>
Â*Svante Schubert:* see [https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/cs02/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-cs02-part3-schema.html#attribute-table_name_element-table_operation]
Â*Svante Schubert:* and [https://docs.oasis-open.org/office/OpenDocument/v1.3/cs02/part3-schema/OpenDocument-v1.3-cs02-part3-schema.html#element-table_highlighted-range]
Â*Patrick:* implementation-defined -> implementation-dependent
Â*Patrick:* resolved by consent - implementation-defined -> implementation-dependent

> 19.677.11 <table:operation> "implementation-defined"
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFFICE-4102
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-4102
>             Project: OASIS Open Document Format for Office Applications (OpenDocument) TC
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Part (Schema), Table
>    Affects Versions: ODF 1.3 CS02
>         Environment: OpenDocument-v1.3-cs02-part3-schema.odt of ODF 1.3 CS02 and presumably older versions too
>            Reporter: Michael Stahl
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: ODF 1.4
>
>
> "The nature of the highlighting imposed on or removed from cells as the result of detective operations is implementation-defined."
> It's unclear what the benefit is of implementations having to specify that.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.3#803004)