opencsa-liaison — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Latest/This Version URI for Schema/WSDL files
Go, Jeff, go..... !!
I'm always in favour of chairs making bold & fast decisions - if people disagree, they will let you know pretty fast, in my experience....
Yours, Mike.
Strategist - Emerging Technologies, SCA & SDO.
Co Chair OASIS SCA Assembly TC.
IBM Hursley Park, Mail Point 146, Winchester, SO21 2JN, Great Britain.
Phone & FAX: +44-1962-818014 Mobile: +44-7802-467431
Email: [email protected]
| Jeff Mischkinsky <[email protected]>
25/03/2008 20:27 |
|
hi all,
I'm fine with this too, so i think this makes everyone. Do we need
a formal kavi ballot or is 7 emails in affirmation enough?
Actually.. to avoid another 7 emails, if my co-chair concurs i
think we can assume silence as no objection to unanimous consent.
otherwise he can start a kavi ballot :-)
-jeff
On Mar 25, 2008, at 12:12 PM, Anish Karmarkar wrote:
> Michael,
>
> Since we are the liaison reps from binding, were we (or was I)
> supposed to do this?
>
> -Anish
> --
>
> Michael Rowley wrote:
>> +1
>> I don't think a meeting is necessary for this one, but I believe that
>> the binding TC was looking for input from the Liason committee
>> regarding
>> whether or not the bindings should be in the SCA namespace, a binding
>> specific namespace, or both. I thought that someone from Bindings
>> was
>> going to be formally asking the Liason committee to provide a
>> recommendation on that.
>> Michael
>>
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]