pkcs11 — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
CK_ULONG considered harmful?
> In the current version of the spec, the definition for CK_ULONG and CK_LONG are "integers at least 32 bits wide".
> Given this spec is at least in part an interface spec, there can be an issue where the client uses a CK_ULONG of 32 bits and the driver uses a CK_ULONG of 64 bits (for example) or vice versa. The text in the section says: Hi Michael I was pretty vocal at the face to face about thinking this is inherently broken. The problem is that changing this value is potentially going to break everything out there. I think stdint.h is a good example of this as a larger problem and the fact that something was finally done about it.
> 2) "Clarify" the language and force things to 32 bits.
> Change the base definitions (page 11, section 2 of the 2.40 draft) to: >
> typedef uint32_t CK_ULONG;
> typedef int_32_t CK_LONG;
> typedef uint8_t CK_BYTE; I think this is reasonable for 2.4, but I would like to see CK_(U)LONG move to uint64_t for >= 3.x --Chris
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]