pkcs11 — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
CK_ULONG considered harmful?
On 5/17/2013 4:14 PM, Valerie Anne Fenwick wrote: For now, I haven't heard of any problems in this area and we've been delivering 64-bit (& 32 bit) PKCS11 libraries for nearly 10 years.
I don't know what the current implementations do - part of the reason why I asked the question.
We seemed to have taken the sample header files largely unmodified, so we have: typedef unsigned long int CK_ULONG; Is anyone else having actual issues with this?
Valerie I think the right thing to do here is for me to withdraw this comment (unless someone comes up with an actual problem encountered).
Mike
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]