pkcs11 — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
CK_ULONG considered harmful?
Suggesting changing a variably defined type (CK_ULONG as a long) to another variably defined type (size_t) is a pretty pointless exercise IMHO that solves nothing in terms of portability of the interface between 32-bit and 64-bit platforms or for a simple network protocol encoding.
However as this isn't a v2.40 topic I suggest we save the real debate (and associated polls) for after we lock down the v2.40 work.
Changing CK_ULONG isn't within the scope of v2.40 as I understand the consensus from the face to face discussions.
If there are disagreements on what should or should not be in scope for v2.40 then we should have a straw poll to settle that issue.
Thanks, Tim.
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]