pmrm — archive

[Chet Ensign]

Members of the PMRM TC, The change to the OASIS process that allows a TC to approve a working draft with non-material changes as a Committee Specification was intended to enable minor editorial fixes to be made without triggering the need for additional review. It also added the condition that should any member raise a concern, the ballot would be rescinded and the TC asked to send the work through public review before approving. After opening your ballot to approve PMRM with Non-Material Changes ( https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/ballot.php?id=2920 )  I received a statement of concern that the changes made were so extensive as to exceed the intent of 'non-material.' I will admit that I myself had qualms when I saw the sheer volume of editorial changes. Therefore, per the requirements of the TC Process ( https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process#committeeSpec ), I am withdrawing this ballot and requesting that you submit it a 15 day public review. Once that review has completed, you will be able to submit it for Special Majority Vote. Please let me know if you have any questions. -- /chet ---------------- Chet Ensign Director of Standards Development and TC Administration  OASIS: Advancing open standards for the information society http://www.oasis-open.org Primary: +1 973-996-2298 Mobile: +1 201-341-1393