Re: [regrep] Meeting agenda and reminder for ebXML Registry telecon December 18th, 2003

["David RR Webber" <david@drrw.info>]

Duane,

I think it would be foolish indeed to think in terms of unseating
established products.

What makes sense is to show value + - a few things spring to
mind:

a) Registry is eBusiness focused - so feature set reflects that -
    existing CMS are document-facing.

b) Federated features hold out possiblity of federating a CMS
    as part of a collection of Registry.

c) Services such as CAM and eForms can strongly compliment
    what a CMS has.

d) Classification scheme support, and say OWL based searching,
     is another area where registry can collaborate with CMS.

DW.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Duane Nickull" <dnickull@adobe.com>
To: "Chiusano Joseph" <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>
Cc: "Breininger Kathryn R" <kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com>; "ebXML Regrep
(ebXML Regrep)" <regrep@lists.oasis-open.org>; "Collins Jeff"
<jcollins@VIGNETTE.COM>
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 11:39 AM
Subject: Re: [regrep] Meeting agenda and reminder for ebXML Registry telecon
December 18th, 2003


> Joseph et al:
>
> I would like to definitely explore this discussion fully.  I have been
> asked on more than one occasion if the ebXML RR competes directly with
> existing CMS's.  I am not familiar with Documentum et al and do not have
> a good grasp.
>
> I believe this is an important aspect of our work.
>
> Duane Nickull
>
> -- 
> Senior Standards Strategist
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://www.adobe.com
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>