Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was:[regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)

[Duane Nickull <dnickull@adobe.com>]

You could also use the Iterator() getNext() method to rip through 
various attribute values until you find the match.

Duane

Duane Nickull wrote:

> Performance has been studied exhaustively.
>
> It is far easier to iterate through second level elements in the DOM 
> matching attribute values that accessing a deeply nested element in a 
> DOM tree.
>
> //using jbuilder v 8
>
> String myValue = 
> toString(root.getChild("Properties).getAttributeValue("assertedBy"));
>
> if (myValue = myToken){
>  //do what you need to do here
> }
>
> This is as simple and perfomance enhanced as it gets.
>
> Duane
>
> David RR Webber wrote:
>
>> Duane,
>>
>> We also need to consider performance issues.
>>
>> Before we pass something over to CEFACT that looks like a 
>> recommendation - we need to attach
>> some caveats.
>>
>> I don't think they should look at this than anything more than some 
>> initial fact gathering.
>>
>> My concern is that engines need to be able to optimize retrieval - 
>> and certainly that is difficult if
>> everything is attribute based.  It makes it almost impossible to 
>> reference things by XPath to
>> limit sections of the structure that may only be needed - especially 
>> thru a http-binding - which is
>> obviously preferred for speed over SOAP requests.
>>
>> The i/o speed is going to be critical for the success of this - so we 
>> need to plan for that and
>> develop accordingly.
>>
>> These are the kind of things we should be helping CEFACT with - 
>> before we jump ahead
>> and recommend structures for storage....
>>
>> Thanks, DW
>> ===============================================
>>
>> Duane Nickull wrote:
>>
>>> Kathryn:
>>>
>>> I have cc'd some of the UN/CEFACT folks.  I will present this 
>>> document during our next telecon so we can kick off the process.  I 
>>> would like to have the one review before we publich this.  In the 
>>> meantime, I will retitle the document "Recommendations to UN/CEFACT 
>>> for the storage of Core Components and BIE's in an ebXML 
>>> Registry-Repository".
>>> They will then be able to absorb whatever parts of it into their 
>>> work they need to.
>>>
>>> Duane
>>>
>>> Breininger, Kathryn R wrote:
>>>
>>>> We can approve it as a committee approved document.  Basic steps are:
>>>>
>>>> 1. Present the document at one of our telecons (just an 
>>>> overview/intro)
>>>> 2. TC reviews for 2 weeks, sends comments
>>>> 3. Comments are resolved
>>>> 4. At the next telecon, TC agrees to vote on the document as a best
>>>> practices paper
>>>> 5. Two week ballot is set up by TC Chair for TC voting
>>>> 6. If TC approves, the document becomes a TC approved document, and is
>>>> posted for public view.
>>>>
>>>> Let me know when you feel it is ready to present and I will add it to
>>>> the agenda.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Kathryn.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Duane Nickull [mailto:dnickull@adobe.com] Sent: Monday, 
>>>> September 20, 2004 8:49 AM
>>>> Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org
>>>> Subject: Re: [regrep] Impact of ICG Adoption on CCRIM SC (Was:
>>>> [regrep]UN/CEFACT-ICG adopts freebXML Registry)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I actually also suggested this to Mark Crawford and others when I 
>>>> was in
>>>>
>>>> DC.  I think it makes sense.
>>>>
>>>> Before we do this, I would like to wrap the work up slightly.  The 
>>>> easiest way to do this is to change the title to something like 
>>>> "Recommendations to UN/CEFACT for storage of Core Components in an 
>>>> ebXML
>>>>
>>>> Registry/Repository" and then approve it as a best practices 
>>>> document within the TC.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure what process we, as a TC, need to go through to 
>>>> approve this as a non normative document.
>>>>
>>>> Kathryn?
>>>>
>>>> Duane
>>>>
>>>> Farrukh Najmi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>>> One important thing I did not mention is that UN/CEFACT is now doing
>>>>> two things as part of their ICG Architecture:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Define a normative expression syntax in XML for Core Components
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. Define a normative mapping from CCTS Information Model to ebXML
>>>>> Registry Information Model
>>>>>
>>>>> These were 2 important specification that SHOULD have been done by
>>>>> CCTS but since they were not we chartered CCRIM SC to do these.
>>>>> Now that UN/CEFACT teams are committed to doing this work I 
>>>>> propose that the CCTS team donate their current work-in-progress 
>>>>> as input (along with any recommendations) to the UN/CEFACT ICG and 
>>>>> CCTS teams and recharter to become the liaison and consultant to 
>>>>> those teams as they define and finalize these two tasks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Duane and others colleagues. What do you think of this idea?
>>>>>
>>>>>   
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the 
>>>> roster of
>>>> the OASIS TC), go to
>>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgr 
>>>>
>>>> oup.php.
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the 
>>> roster of the OASIS TC), go to 
>>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
>> of the OASIS TC), go to 
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster 
> of the OASIS TC), go to 
> http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/regrep/members/leave_workgroup.php. 
>
>