[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [rights-specification] 2002-08-21 Notes
done.
thanks,
thomas.
-----Original Message-----
From: Kawamori [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, August 25, 2002 7:39 PM
To: DeMartini, Thomas
Cc: '[email protected]'
Subject: Re: [rights-specification] 2002-08-21 Notes
Hello Thomas.
I was at the concall. Can you tick my name please?
Thanks in advance.
On Fri, 23 Aug 2002 16:39:55 -0700
"DeMartini, Thomas" <[email protected]> wrote:
Thomas.DeMartini> <<20020821 spec sc concall.txt>>
Thomas.DeMartini>
Thomas.DeMartini> Thanks,
Thomas.DeMartini> Thomas.
--
Kawamori
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Attendees (Y/N):
[Y] Carlisle Adams
[Y] Bob Atkinson
[Y] Thomas DeMartini
[N] Bob DuCharme
[N] John Erickson
[Y] Thomas Hardjono
[N] Hal Lockhart
[Y] Kawamori Masahito
[Y] M. Paramasivam
[Y] Krishna Sankar
[N] Peter Schirling
[Y] Others: Brad Gandee, Martha Nalebuff, Hari Reddy, Xin Wang
Resulting Action Items:
None.
Schedule:
2002-06-12 Change Management Process Working Draft -- Done.
2002-06-12 Change Request Template Working Draft -- Done.
2002-06-19 Approved Change Management Process SC Draft -- Done.
2002-06-19 Approved Change Request Template SC Draft -- Done.
2002-06-26 RLTC-Approved Change Management Process -- Done.
2002-06-26 RLTC-Approved Change Request Template -- Done.
2002-06-26 Begin accepting Change Requests -- Done.
2002-08-21 -- We Are Here.
2002-09-10 Stop accepting Change Requests.
2002-09-11 Spec SC F2F @ Cisco, San Jose
2002-09-12 RLTC F2F @ Cisco, San Jose
2002-09-13 Spec SC F2F @ Cisco, San Jose
2002-10-07 Spec SC F2F @ Cisco, San Jose
2002-10-08 Spec SC F2F @ Cisco, San Jose
2002-10-09 Spec SC F2F @ Cisco, San Jose
2002-10-15 Finish writing and editing specification.
2002-12-01 Package to OASIS administration for processing.
2003-01-01 Package to OASIS members for review.
2003-04-01 Package to OASIS members for voting.
2003-05-01 OASIS spec.
Previous Action Item Review:
None.
Discussion:
* Reviewed CR00002 (ISO Codes).
* O.K. with the general idea, but concerns were raised.
* For all codes, would a version # be better than a date?
* For currency codes, what happens when currency is revalued?
* Does ISO issue a new code or change the meaning of the code?
* If not, does some other organization keep track of
revaluations?
* If not, does UBL have a solution for this we could borrow?
* If not, does anyone else have a solution we could use?
* Next meeting is 2002-08-28. We will talk some more about CR00002
and discuss how to turn the requirements into CRs and split up the
work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC