[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sarif] Work item URI array
If we make the change now, a three-part motion would be OK. The change would have to have been incorporated into the document that is in the zip file, and if it is rejected, the motion as a whole fails.
David On 06/06/2018 03:38 PM, Larry Golding (Comcast) wrote:
I’m worried about our having deferred to CSD.2 the discussion of whether
result.workItemUri should be an array. I think this is very likely to be
useful, and if we defer it it’s a breaking change.
Let’s split this discussion into two parts:
1. Do we want to take this change?
2. If so, is there a way to get it into CSD.1? For example, could the
email that Stefan and David are about to send, proposing a two-part
motion, instead propose a three-part motion, the first part of which
accepts this change? (Then we could do it in a single 7-day e-ballot).
Thanks,
Larry
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]