[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 20 - annotations on parameters
But it becomes redundant based on the text you proposed.
Dave Booz
STSM, SCA and WebSphere Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome
Simon Nash
<NASH@uk.ibm.com>
To
06/19/2008 10:01 David Booz/Poughkeepsie/IBM@IBMUS
AM cc
sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 20 - annotations
on parameters
Dave,
In WD 03, the following paragraph already has the correct words.
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
David Booz <booz@us.ibm.com>
19/06/2008 14:45 To
sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 20 -
annotations on parameters
I think you need to replace more than the lines you've identified.
The line numbers in my copy of WD03 don't match yours, so I'll insert the
text in WD03 that needs to be replaced.
The @Property annotation is used to denote a Java class field or a
setter method that is used to inject an SCA property value. The type of
the property injected, which can be a simple Java type or a complex Java
type, is defined by the type of the Java class field or the type of the
setter method input argument.
The @Property annotation may be used on protected or public fields, on
setter methods or on a constructor method parameter.
I suspect that might be lines 1630-1635, maybe? For me it's lines
1318-1323.
Dave Booz
STSM, SCA and WebSphere Architecture
Co-Chair OASIS SCA-Policy TC
"Distributed objects first, then world hunger"
Poughkeepsie, NY (845)-435-6093 or 8-295-6093
e-mail:booz@us.ibm.com
http://washome.austin.ibm.com/xwiki/bin/view/SCA2Team/WebHome
Simon Nash
<NASH@uk.ibm.com>
To
06/19/2008 07:15 sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
AM cc
Subject
Re: [sca-j] ISSUE 20 - annotations
on parameters
The @Reference portion of this issue would be resolved by the proposal for
issue 43. For the @Property portion, I propose the following wording:
PROPOSAL: Change lines 1630 through 1633 in WD 03 to read the following:
The @Property annotation is used to denote a Java class
protected or public field, a setter method, or a constructor parameter
that is used to inject an SCA property value. The type of the property
injected, which can be a simple Java type or a complex Java type,
is defined by the type of the Java class field or the type of the input
parameter of the setter method or constructor.
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
"Barack, Ron" <ron.barack@sap.com>
31/01/2008 16:26 To
<sca-j@lists.oasis-ope
n.org>
cc
Subject
[sca-j] ISSUE 20 -
annotations on
parameters
http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/JAVA-20
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Simon Nash [mailto:NASH@uk.ibm.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 30. Januar 2008 02:22
An: sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org
Betreff: Re: [sca-j] NEW ISSUE annotations on parameters
There is text elsewhere (lines 82 to 84 in section 2.2) that mentions
@Reference annotations on setter and constructor parameters. So the spec
is inconsistent and this is a valid issue.
Simon
Simon C. Nash, IBM Distinguished Engineer
Member of the IBM Academy of Technology
Tel. +44-1962-815156 Fax +44-1962-818999
"Peshev, Peter" <peter.peshev@sap.com>
28/01/2008 15:41
To
<sca-j@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject
[sca-j] NEW ISSUE annotations on parameters
TARGET: Java Common Annotations and APIs Specification Version 1.1 (WD
26 September 2007)
DESCRIPTION:
The current Reference and Property annotation are defined in sections
8.13 and 8.14 as :
@Target({METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
public @interface Reference {
@Target({METHOD, FIELD, PARAMETER})
@Retention(RUNTIME)
public @interface Property {
I.e. there is a possibility to define those annotations on parameter.
However the text description doesn't allow that feature and mentions
only field \ setter method injection :
"The @Property annotation type is used to annotate a Java class field or
a setter method that is used to inject an SCA property value. "
"The @Reference annotation type is used to annotate a Java class field
or a setter method that is used to inject a service that resolves the
reference."
PROPOSAL:
Drop the possibility of defining those annotations on parameters.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in
OASIS
at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]