security-services message

Subject: RE: [security-services] LA 1.1, SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0

From: "Mishra, Prateek" <pmishra@netegrity.com>
To: "'Jeff.Hodges@sun.com'" <Jeff.Hodges@sun.com>, [email protected]
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:45:58 -0400


> 
> (A) "Destination-Site First" web browser profile
> (B) (Web Browser Profile)/General Meta-data Specification
> 
> I would like to propose for DISCUSSION the idea that in the current
> circumstances we should avoid including Category (2) items in SAML 1.1.
Why?
                                         ^
                               just those two (A,B) ?


These are the main proposed extensions. Not sure there are any others.

- prateek