RE: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA challenge?

["Peter F Brown" <peter@justbrown.net>]

I'd support this as it clearly is the practical answer to the point I raised
about this valuable thread become frayed...

Jamie: does each TC simply need a formal decision to agree to this or can
the chairs pow-wow together and fix it up?

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: James Bryce Clark [mailto:jamie.clark@oasis-open.org] 
Sent: 17 November 2005 19:46
To: soa-rm@lists.oasis-open.org; fwsi@lists.oasis-open.org;
soa-blueprints@lists.oasis-open.org; ebsoa@liasts.oasis-open.org;
semantic-ex@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [soa-rm] JtC = cross post solution (was) ... Re: The real SOA
challenge?

     1.  Reply to Joe and John:  I hope so.
     2.  Request to all:  This interesting but long thread is going on in
five e-mail lists.  These TCs have much in common, that properly is a basis
for further chat, but while maintaining the separate and independent
activities of each TC.  I would like to suggest a solution.  It would take
some duplicate traffic off these lists, and provide a place for these
cross-TC, SOA-oriented coordination conversations.
     I suggest that these 5 TCs consider starting a "service architecture
joint committee."  The rules of that OASIS structure can be found at
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#2.16.  It does not require
any surrender of each committee's own work plan or views, but would provide
a forum for discussion of possible voluntary coordination.  I will take this
up further with your committee chairs, and discuss what kind of
charter/outline might work.  If the TCs (or some subset of them) wish to do
so, a JtC would create a place where matters of joint interest can be more
effectively discussed.
     Regards  Jamie

~   James Bryce Clark
~   Director, Standards Development, OASIS
~   jamie.clark@oasis-open.org

At 08:39 AM 11/17/2005, Chiusano Joseph wrote:
>>From: John Hardin [mailto:john@maphin.net]
>>Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 10:29 AM
>>* * *
>>We are working these three items into the next generation of the OASIS 
>>Technical Architecture.
>
>I believe you meant to say "ebXML Technical Architecture"?
>Joe