Re: [ubl-clsc] [Fwd: Re: UBL amount type code list solution]

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

[anne.hendry@sun.com:]

| Ken/Mavis/Sue you could add Stephen as an observer, which I 
| think gives him posting abitlity

Done.  But if this is something that cuts across SCs, the
discussion should be taking place on the ubl list.

Jon

   Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 16:12:52 -0800
   From: Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>

     Here is forward post from Stephen regarding the need to define a new 
   specialized type for amoun type.  There seems to be some code missing 
   (Stephen, can you provide the section in the middle that seems 
   missing?), but the gist of the solution is in the prose, and David was 
   in the meeting and said he understood what needed to be done.  If you 
   have further questions, send to Stephen and one of us can repost (or 
   perhaps, Ken/Mavis/Sue you could add Stephen as an observer, which I 
   think gives him posting abitlity?)?

   Thanks,
   Anne