Re: [ubl-ndrsc] more input

["Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@sun.com>]

At 05:31 PM 11/8/01 -0600, Mike Rawlins wrote:
>We talked through a lot of different user profiles (and corresponding
>use cases) in the planning committee, and that is how we came up with
>the ubiquitous "various and sundry".  What we *didn't* do was assign
>priorities.  Hello, Eve?  Is this something we want to take on ask a
>task?  I think that is what Kelly is concerned about...

Sounds reasonable, although I despair of finding a truly *accurate* 
weighting of the various/sundry situations.

What if each of the people on the SC submit a description of the situations 
they know of (either through personal experience or second-hand) regarding 
the handling and use of schemas, done as semi-formal use cases, and then we 
discuss and rank them in Wednesday's call?  I think that doing this, along 
with approving our issue outline, will be a good accomplishment for the 
next meeting.

Dave, if you have any UML-related words of wisdom about designing use 
cases, that would be welcome.

         Eve
--
Eve Maler                                    +1 781 442 3190
Sun Microsystems XML Technology Center   eve.maler @ sun.com