[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl-psc] Re: Meeting tomorrow morning - add Catalogue Request.Requested Catalogue Line
|
if we change any definitions, DENs (or almost aything in the
spreadsheets) then there are changes to the schemas because these
values appear in the schemas. but they only appear as comments
(annotations) to the schema. they don't impact the normative aspects
of the schemas because they dont affect the validation of documents. So the impact of changes to DENs is the same impact as changes to definitions. We will need to update schemas but not in a way that affects their normative behaviour. Sylvia Webb wrote: Is there any impact on the schema? I personally don't have a problem with adding additional editorial changes up to the time we meet. There is no impact to the schema for the editorial changes we're making now including changes to the definitions, but I'm concerned that there may be an impact to schema if changes are made to the DEN. Sylvia -----Original Message----- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 5:52 PM To: Tim McGrath Cc: Martin Forsberg; swebb@gefeg.com; [email protected]; [email protected]; ubl-psc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-psc] Re: Meeting tomorrow morning - add Catalogue Request. Requested Catalogue Line Can I add to this list... Dictionary Entry Name for "Catalogue Request. Requested Catalogue Line" should say "Catalogue Request. Catalogue Request Line" Tim McGrath wrote: -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]