Re: [ubl-tsc] Re: [ubl-psc] eview of schemas, meeting in the PSC Tuesday the 23rd of March 15 CET

["G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>]

At 2010-03-22 17:59 +0100, Roberto Cisternino wrote:
>5) Code lists
>
>     I think we should align some code lists available at UN/ECE
>
>Latest UN/ECE codelists are here:
>http://www.unece.org/cefact/xml_schemas/index.htm#2009A

The question to committee members isn't whether we should have code 
lists, but rather:

  (1) - which code lists are to be included in the UBL 2.1 distribution?

  (2) - for each code list is it to be included in the special-purpose
        directory as a convenience for UBL users, or should it be
        engaged as a data type qualification in the committee-decided
        set of code list value qualifications?

Regarding (2) it was proposed in Copenhagen that no new UBL 2.1 code 
lists be engaged as data type qualifications other than any updates 
available for those data type qualifications already engaged in UBL 2.0.

Can you recommend which code lists should be included for the 
convenience of UBL users, or justify if the committee should add any 
particular ones to the set of distributed data type qualifications?

. . . . . . . . . . . Ken


--
XSLT/XQuery training:         San Carlos, California 2010-04-26/30
Principles of XSLT for XQuery Writers: San Francisco,CA 2010-05-03
XSLT/XQuery training:                 Ottawa, Canada 2010-05-10/14
XSLT/XQuery/UBL/Code List training: Trondheim,Norway 2010-06-02/11
Vote for your XML training:   http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/i/
Crane Softwrights Ltd.          http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/
G. Ken Holman                 mailto:gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com
Male Cancer Awareness Nov'07  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/o/bc
Legal business disclaimers:  http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/legal