question on open alignment issues

[Anne Hendry <anne.hendry@sun.com>]

Hi,

 From original F2F report, the UBL-CoreComponentTypes Issue #2 was:
   The order of the supplementary components for "Code. Type" and
   "Identifier. Type" should be aligned with the one used in the CCT
    schema and in CCTS 2.01.

But I am seeing that neither schema nor ss are in CCTS order for 
BinaryObjectType.
Should this be on the list to be fixed as well?

BTW, Mark's comment on this is that there is no normative order for 
attributes.
So, I assume we are just doing this for the sake of simplifying the 
tools work.
Is this right, or do you see some other reason for having them in the 
order shown in CCTS?

Thanks,
Anne