ubl — archive

Re: Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests

From: Stephen Green
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2004 18:00:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: Re: [ubl] Re: AW: UBL schema tests




From: <[email protected]>
To: Lisa-Aeon <[email protected]>
Date: Mon,  8 Mar 2004 19:12:01 +0100







Lisa and All

Personally I'm not sure we now have any need of any Codelist Schema
Modules. It was decided that Specialised DataTypes could be used for
those Codelists which need XSD validation. 
Is there any need for anything other than the SDT Schema Module for
these?
If so then we would need a set of Codelist Schema Modules but I think
it was decided, wasn't it, that there would be one prefix 'sdt:' for
such codes.
The other need for Codelist Schema Modules might have been for the other
codes but these, it was decided wasn't it, would not have XSD validation
so therefore they would surely not need a Schema -  they would have the
'udt:'prefix, the CodeType being included in the Unspecialised
Schema Module.
If this is wrong could someone explain quickly.
I *think* (not sure) that Codelist Schema Module may be a vestige from
the previous (Montreal) codelist solution (along with the codelist
folders and its subfolders). Someone please correct me again.

Steve



Lisa-Aeon <[email protected]> wrote on 08.03.2004, 15:36:45:
> Marty Burns and I are reviewing the draft 7.1 codelist right now also.  We
> are alittle confused, we are using Marks Visio drawing from the face to face
> and there seems to be missing pieces of the codelist stuff.  Is there
> supposed to be a Codelist Schema Modules?  not just Unqualified Codelist
> module.  Where will it reside, and what will be in it?
> 
> Also, in the Common Basic Components, and in the CCT there are types that
> have attributes that are code list values, but they are not inheriting from
> codelists.  For example - Amount.Type.
> 
> We need some answers on how this is all supposed to work......neither Marty
> or I were in the meeting where this was discussed at the F2F.  We are trying
> to see how the CCT and CCP are working within the Codelist modules, and we
> are not seeing it.  For example:  Codetype contains a listID that is not the
> CCP listID.
> 
> Not having these answers is slowing down the review of this work.  Can
> someone please get back to us.
> 
> Lisa and Marty.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>