ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Specialised DataTypes Schema Module

From: Jon Bosak
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:44:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Specialised DataTypes Schema Module




From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 07:58:38 -0800 (PST)






[[email protected]:]

| We cannot constantly reconsider (or simply ignore) past decisions
| if we expect to make any progress here.

Unfortunately we are not talking in this case about decisions that
were made in a quorate group.  We have nonquorate groups meeting
in isolation and arriving at separate solutions.  This includes
the committee of the whole that met in Washington.

The coordination calls (such as the one this morning that is
working out a structure for the schema modules as I write this)
are the only mechanism we have for arriving at a consensus across
subcommittees.  This is where the decisions are actually being
made, and as I've indicated in recent messages, people who don't
participate in these joint calls are simply not going to count in
arriving at a solution.

Jon








References:

RE: [ubl] Specialised DataTypes Schema Module
From: Grimley Michael J NPRI <[email protected]>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]