ubl — archive

[Michael Dill]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: AW: [ubl] Change requests for the next 1.0 schema generation




From: "Michael Dill" <dill2@gefeg.com>
To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:12:22 +0100









Ooooh, 
I seem to remember that the NDR discussion in Washington was just the 
other way round and that the group disagreed with my 'simple' CCTS 
approach.
Now, 
I'm confused.
Stephen: help
Michael
 

  
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Grimley Michael J NPRI 
  [mailto:GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. M�rz 
  2004 15:02
An: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Betreff: RE: [ubl] 
  Change requests for the next 1.0 schema generation


  
Greetings,
  
 
  
As 
  mentioned in a previous email, and not included below, the latest CCT schema still has 'DateTime', 'Indicator' and 'Numeric' 
  types defined as simple types (with a *Restriction* on the built in 
  type).

  

  
I believe we had agreed in Washington 
  that they would be redefined to conform to the CCTS. That is, the required 
  supplementary component 'Format' would be added to the definition of 
  each.
  
I 
  wasn't able to make yesterday's meeting (until the end, anyway) and Jon has 
  made it very clear that that is where the decisions are made; however, this 
  involves CCTS conformance and, if I am not mistaken, the decision was made in 
  joint session with Tim and Steve on the phone, so there was good 
  representation of all concerned SCs.
  
Thank 
  You,
  
Mike 
  Grimley