ubl — archive

[Tim McGrath]

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Change requests for the next 1.0 schema generation




From: Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>
To: Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2004 09:12:44 +0800










sorry mike, this was agreed as you stated.  my notes say...

Issue 12: 'format' supplementary components not in cct schema module (MikeG)
Resolution:  These should be added to the CCT schema for Numeric, Indicator and DateTime (as per models).  
this is CCTS requirement.
we just encourgae implementations not to use them.
David to fix.
if this does not align with your understanding, then can you re-state it
better.  we wanted to say what you understood.


Grimley Michael J NPRI wrote:

 
 
  
   
  
 
    
  
Greetings,
 
  
 
 
  
As  mentioned in a previous email, and not included
below,  the latest CCT schema still has 'DateTime',
'Indicator' and  'Numeric' types defined as simple types (with a *Restriction*
on the built in  type).
 
  
 
  
I believe we had agreed
in Washington  that they would be redefined to conform to the CCTS. That
is, the required  supplementary component 'Format' would be added to the
definition of  each.
 
  
I wasn't  able to make yesterday's meeting (until
the end, anyway) and Jon has made it  very clear that that is where the decisions
are made; however, this involves  CCTS conformance and, if I am not mistaken,
the decision was made in joint  session with Tim and Steve on the phone,
so there was good representation of all  concerned SCs.
 
  
Thank  You,
 
  
Mike  Grimley