ubl — archive

RE: [ubl] Draft 9.1 Schema Review - CCT and UDT schemas

From: Michael Grimley
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:19:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->
















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: RE: [ubl] Draft 9.1 Schema Review - CCT and UDT schemas




From: Grimley Michael J NPRI <[email protected]>
To: 'Tim McGrath' <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 09:32:39 -0500






RE: Version element in documentation:

> it appears we are missing this parameter.  but shouldn't it be 
> automatically taken from the build number (e.g. "1.0-draft-9.1") ?

I would say 'yes'.

=========================================================================

RE: use="optional":

> yes, consistency is what we need.  i seem to recall that in other cases 
> (minOccurs??) we said we would not rely on defaults and explicitly 
> define attributes - is that true?

I have no strong feelings on this either way; however, it is nice to explicitly state attribute values for those people who may not know, offhand, what the default value is.