ubl — archive
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]
Re: [ubl] Joint meeting Tuesday
MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->ubl message
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] Joint meeting Tuesday
- From: [email protected]
- To: [email protected]
- Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 21:18:47 -0800 (PST)
[[email protected]:] | I think what Jon was proposing is that we use this week to | evaluate the draft 9 schemas and try to come up with a viable UBL | 1.0 package. This was the intent of his errata note to announce | the meeting of March 30th. If we really do achieve a consensus, then we won't actually need a quorate meeting to vote on this. But it didn't seem to me that we were arriving at a consensus. If we can't achieve general agreement, then we will have to decide the remaining issues through voting so that we can continue to meet our release schedule. I would rather proceed by general consent because voting is slower, but voting is faster than hanging. We are not going to hang. We are going to release UBL 1.0. I'll see how we're doing in the Wednesday 24 March coordination call (thanks for the agenda, Tim) and assess the situation then. If we can avoid holding a plenary meeting by phone, that would be great. Jon
- References:
- Re: [ubl] Joint meeting Tuesday
- From: Tim McGrath <[email protected]>
- Re: [ubl] Joint meeting Tuesday
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
— [Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [Month Index]
| [List Home]