ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Naming of the Order Response document type

From: Monica Martin
To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 14:15:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->

















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Naming of the Order Response document type




From: "Monica J. Martin" <[email protected]>
To: Tim McGrath <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2004 07:14:25 -0700






Tim McGrath wrote:

> At a recent presentation on UBL I was asked if we were aware of the 
> issues conerning naming our document type "Order Response". 
> The questioner expressed a concern that there were global trade 
> practice implications and we would be better to call this an 
> "Acknowledgement of Receipt of Order".  Apparently this was suggested 
> by  some authority in the United States.
>
> Does anyone know anything about this matter?  I cannot imagine what 
> this means but I committed to get a response from the TC - so i would 
> appreciate any input.
>
Acknowledgment of receipt is not a business message but a signal that 
does not include a business document.  Please see ebXML BPSS for further 
definition.  The acknowledgment of receipt signal indicates the receipt 
of a request that has passed a syntactic check. It does not indicate the 
request (in this case order request) has been handed over for processing 
or is being processed. Thanks.









References:

Naming of the Order Response document type
From: Tim McGrath <[email protected]>






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]