ubl — archive

Re: [ubl] Minutes for Pacific UBL TC call 21|22 March 2005

From: Tim McGrath
To: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 06:34:00 -0000

 MHonArc v2.5.0b2 -->



















ubl message






[Date Prev]
 | [Thread Prev]
 | [Thread Next]
 | [Date Next]

--

[Date Index]
 | [Thread Index]
 | [List Home]








Subject: Re: [ubl] Minutes for Pacific UBL TC call 21|22 March 2005




From: Tim McGrath <[email protected]>
To: Yukinori Saito <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:27:00 +0800






my apologies for not being clearer. you are correct we propose a new
ASBIE for Delivery that associates with Contact. But it will be added to
the end of the current structure - as required by the customization rules.

Yukinori Saito wrote:

>Dear Tim McGrath
>
>Thank you very much for your Minutes for Pacific UBL TC call 21|22 March
>2005.
>
>Your minutes says the following sentence regarding Item 6 (DeliveryContact)
>in CONTENT WORK SESSION.
>
>| Item 6. DeliveryContact to be a new ASBIE between Delivery and Contact.
>| (occurrences 0..n ??)
>
>I cannot understand the phrase 'between Delivery and Contact' clearly.
>
>My understanding of resolution regarding Item 6 is following.
>DeliveryContact to be a new ASBIE in Delivery (ABIE). (occurrences 0..n ??)
>The inserting position of the new DeliveryContact (ASBIE) will be better to
>be near position of the DeliveryAddress (ASBIE) in Delivery (ABIE).
>
>Is my understanding suitable? Or am I misunderstanding something?
>
>Best Regards,
>Yukinori Saito
>-------------------------------------------
>Yukinori Saito
>Fuji Electric Information Service Co., Ltd. (FIS)
>e-mail: [email protected]
>Tel: +81-3-5435-7333     Fax: +81-3-5435-7513
>------------------------------------------- 
>
>