ubl — archive

Re: Re: [ubl] Re: More typos in the IDD spreadsheets and UBL 2.0spreadsheet models

From: Tim McGrath
To: [email protected]
Date: Sat, 08 Sep 2007 01:13:00 -0000

> > At 2007-09-05 12:06 +0800, Tim McGrath wrote: > > Other than those 6, the set of DENs found in > CommonAggregateComponents XSD and document XSD files matches the set > of DENs found in the massaged IDD spreadsheets. > > So I think the XSD documentation of the DEN and other columns is > incorrect in four places because the algorithm acted on invalid > component cell values in the master spreadsheet. None of these XSD > changes will affect schema-validity of UBL instances. I think the > other two differences are repairs to the IDD DEN values. > > Tim, can you confirm this please? > > yes, i agree - you are correct. > Thanks! > > . . . . . . . . . . . . Ken -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath