uddi-sc message

Subject: AW: [uddi-sc] Updated UDDI MS SC ROP v.11
From: "Fritz, Franz-Josef" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected], George Zagelow <[email protected]>,"Fritz, Franz-Josef" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:36:49 +0200
Hi all,
here come my remarks. As far as possible I have edited the text. In some cases, I could only add a comment in a bracket for further discussion.
Soime more remarks
- I feel that we need to conform to OASIS policies and go away from organizational representatives in the SC (and therefore also dismiss the concept of alternates)
- I agree with the rules of "good standing"  from George, however, 100% of a meeting could be problematic. Being 5 minutes late in a phone conference should not be a big deal.
- I would like to give the whole document a better and more natural structure, e.g. section 5 before section 4. But I would work on that once we have the content approved.

Best regards - Franz Fritz


-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Fred Federlein [mailto:[email protected]]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. September 2002 16:46
An: George Zagelow
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [uddi-sc] Updated UDDI MS SC ROP v.11


Good comments, George - I will incorporate and send out by Monday.

Fred

George Zagelow wrote:
> 
> These changes look fine.   I think we can defer the discussion of at-large
> seats until we see the makeup of the member section.
> 
> A couple of proposed areas to work on:
> 1) To retain membership on the Steering Committee, each member or alternate
> must attend at least 2/3 of the meetings, and cannot miss more than 2
> meetings in a row.   "Attendance" at meetings means attendance at 100% of
> the meeting.   Members who do not fulfill these requirements will lose
> their seat, which will be filled as described in the section on filling
> vacancies.   Attendance will be noted in the meeting minutes.   The chair
> will keep track of attendance records.
> 2) Do we have any requirements on being a member of the member section?
> Will there be meetings of the entire member section?   How do we decide who
> gets to vote for the Steering Committee?
> 3) We should have a vice chair, who will chair meetings in the absence of
> the chair.  If both chair and vice chair are absent, the chair's alternate
> will chair the meeting, then the vice chair's alternate.    The chair's
> alternate does not have succession rights to be chair.   If the chair
> becomes unable to continue as chair, a new chair will be elected.
> 
> Comments on these?   Thanks...
> 
> Regards, George
> XML System Manager
> Chair, OASIS UDDI Member Section Steering Committee
> Managing Director, UDDI Operators Council
> Emerging e-business Standards, SWG
> 1-408-463-4041 or 543-4041, FAX 3319
> [email protected]
> 
> Fred Federlein <[email protected]> on 09/26/2002 01:30:30 PM
> 
> Please respond to [email protected]
> 
> To:    UDDI-SC <[email protected]>
> cc:
> Subject:    [uddi-sc] Updated UDDI MS SC ROP v.11
> 
> Hi,
> 
> A day late and a dollar short - Here is the updated draft of the ROP
> with modifications based on last Friday's discussion.
> 
> I made the following changes/additions:
> 
> Lines
> =====
> 33-39 Annual elections on anniversary of Oasis UDDI Transfer
>  7 Members on SC
>  Member Orgs can appoint alternate rep
> 
> 41-42       Clarifying what they have a right to vote for.
> 
> 44-46 Specifying 2 yr term and 1st year ballot ranking to force
> staggered terms.
> 
> 48-50 Number of SC members can be adjusted annually as required.
> 
> 49    Deleted redundant annual election statement
> 
> 55-57 Restatement of annual election timing.
> 
> 63-65 Allowance for replacement if Member Org goes away.
> 
> Note - I didn't mention the 2/3 quorum required for a meeting - I
> believe that is covered by Roberts Rules of Order.
> 
> I also didn't introduce the concept of at-large or ad-hoc seats that we
> discussed, based on % of individual participation - not sure how to
> apporach that, or if should delay that till a later date. Is the Member
> Section comprised of JUST Organizational Members? If not, then we need
> to modify the eligability - looking at lines 41-42 as a model, if only
> Org Members can vote, doesn't appear that indivivual members are
> intended to participate. Please offer your opinions on this.
> 
> Please give me feedback on this, and I will update and re-distribute.
> 
> Regards,
> Fred
> ________________________________________________
> Fred Federlein -- Market Development Manager
> Sun Microsystems,Inc. Developer Network Group
> 1 Network Drive BURL01-201 Burlington, MA 01803
> 781-442-0319 -- [email protected]
> http://www.sun.com/developers
> 
> (See attached file: UDDI_SC_RoP_11.doc)
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                          Name: UDDI_SC_RoP_11.doc
>    UDDI_SC_RoP_11.doc    Type: Microsoft Word Document (application/msword)
>                      Encoding: base64

-- 
________________________________________________
Fred Federlein -- Market Development Manager
Sun Microsystems,Inc. Developer Network Group
1 Network Drive BURL01-201 Burlington, MA 01803
781-442-0319 -- [email protected]
http://www.sun.com/developers

----------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription
manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
Attachment: UDDI_SC_RoP_11 2002-09-27 FF.doc
Description: MS-Word document