virtio — archive

[Cornelia Huck <mst@redhat.com>]

On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 23:07:21 +0200 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:21:28AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:44:41 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > We will also need some process to periodically approve > > > post-factum formatting, typo fixes and similar simple changes. > > > We don't want issue tracking for these I think. > > > I'll probably put these up for voting about once > > > a month or so, we'll see. > > > > Should we perhaps have an issue that is collecting all those minor > > fixes and is simply opened after month? > > > > > All this likely will mean there will be a bunch of ballots > > > running on the TC at all times. > > > If you can't vote, pls remember to mark up your status > > > as leave of absence. > > > > After having searched on the oasis site for a while: Remind me how one > > does so? > > > > > Cornelia, could you please start with CCW patches you posted so we can > > > try this out, see how well it works? > > > > That would be 116-119 and 129, right? I can give it a try later. > > OK I started the ballot on 129 so we can try. > Pls take a look, and tell me if you see any issues. 129 looks good to me. > > For 116-119 - I'm not sure which versions should these changes go into. > At this point we have virtio 1.0 branch for bug fixes > and master branch (still out of date, but I'll update it once > cs02 is out) that will become 1.1 for new features. > > Please set "fix in versions" on the issues accordingly, > then we can start the ballots. > Pls note that if there are material changes, a new public > review period will be required before release. I'll try to figure these out, although I'm trying to juggle way too much stuff at the moment... > > I also mistakenly opened 116 and 117, I don't want to bother > deferring, but generally should be open only after ballot > started, with comment pointing to the ballot. >