virtio — archive

voting and issue tracking for virtio 1.0cs03/1.1

From: Cornelia Huck <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2015 07:56:00 -0000

On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 00:12:57 +0100 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:52:23 +0200 > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:21:28AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:44:41 +0200 > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > We will also need some process to periodically approve > > > > > post-factum formatting, typo fixes and similar simple changes. > > > > > We don't want issue tracking for these I think. > > > > > I'll probably put these up for voting about once > > > > > a month or so, we'll see. > > > > > > > > Should we perhaps have an issue that is collecting all those minor > > > > fixes and is simply opened after month? > > > > > > > > > All this likely will mean there will be a bunch of ballots > > > > > running on the TC at all times. > > > > > If you can't vote, pls remember to mark up your status > > > > > as leave of absence. > > > > > > > > After having searched on the oasis site for a while: Remind me how one > > > > does so? > > > > > > > > > Cornelia, could you please start with CCW patches you posted so we can > > > > > try this out, see how well it works? > > > > > > > > That would be 116-119 and 129, right? I can give it a try later. > > > > > > I can do the technicalies if it's hard for you, but > > > I need to know which are bugfixes intended for 1.0-cs03 and > > > which are features for 1.1 only. > > > > OK, changed 116/118/119/127. Don't remember the reporter though (ISTR > > it was me). > > I think so. Pls fill it. Done. > Do you think 116 is non material? I'm not 100% sure it would qualify as such. I think 118 is, though. > > > > 117 is not ready yet (no proposed change). I think we also > > need to handle 125, don't we? > > why not, that's easy. Done. I think this one is non-material as well.