[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] call today 9:30 PDT
|
This is the list as Peter sees it. Let us
verify what is already done. Thanks for offering to take three issues.
I am wondering if 10 should be deferred until we have thought through the “reentrancy”
aspects. Let us discuss in a few minutes. From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com] To save some time on the call, I thought I would
volunteer to take some of the issues.
Sorry about being tardy with this. I have been swamped - vacations haveevil consequences. We have a lot of issues to incorporate. Once wefinish with this we are charged with producing a clean draft. The focustoday should be on making a schedule for the resolved issues (listbelow). I realize that there is unfinished technical resolutionbusiness related to Issue 10.SatishIssue 1Permeability of scopesIssue 10Serialization of compensationIssue 34Dependency on Proprietary SpecificationsIssue 37Initiating Correlation Set More Than OnceIssue 43Setting up Periodic AlarmsIssue 44portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkTypeIssue 75Locally Scoped partnerLink declarationsIssue 84Require Static Analysis Description & ListIssue 94Allow both "compensate" and other activities in compensation or faulthandlerIssue 105XML namespaces used in spec and examples need to be definedIssue 114Multiple Correlation SetsIssue 126Event Handlers with local partnerLinks & Correlation SetsIssue 128WS-I BP Incompatible WSDL Import
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]