RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors' call

Alex has been maintaining the separate schema for us. Alex, could you merge Prasad’s changes in with yours please?

From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2004 3:21 PM
To: Alex Yiu
Cc: Satish Thatte; bpel spec
Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors' call

Alex / Satish / Paco,

There were some schema changes that went in with the updates I made for issues 43 and 44. I only updated the word file. I forgot about the separate schema file being maintained. How do you want to handle these? Are Alex/Paco doing this so that it is controlled? Or should I go ahead and update the schema myself? Let me know. Thanks.

Regards, Prasad

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors' call
Date:	Wed, 21 Jul 2004 14:30:42 -0700
From:	Alex Yiu <alex.yiu@oracle.com>
To:	Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
CC:	Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>, bpel spec <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>
References:	D78C42C1ADD5CF41AE3B60B03C39D1CD0275C46E@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com"><D78C42C1ADD5CF41AE3B60B03C39D1CD0275C46E@RED-MSG-52.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> 40F72A2C.4020502@webmethods.com"><40F72A2C.4020502@webmethods.com>

Hi, all,

I have checked in changes in both XSD and word file for Issue 34 changes.
As we discussed in the conf call this morning, it contains only the original Issue 34 semantics (i.e. the attribute is required)

I am handing the pen off now.

Thanks!

Regards,
Alex YIu

Prasad Yendluri wrote:

Hi All,

I just checked in the updates for issues 43 and 44. I am handing Pen off.

Alex, I guess you get the pen.

Thanks, Prasad

-------- Original Message --------

Subject:	[wsbpel-spec-edit] Summary of today's editors' call
Date:	Wed, 14 Jul 2004 10:07:23 -0700
From:	Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>
To:	Prasad Yendluri <pyendluri@webmethods.com>
CC:	bpel spec <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>, <peter.furniss@choreology.com>

Issues 37, 75, 94 and 114 were indeed incorporated by Alex on June 30.

They should be removed from the list of "not yet incorporated" issues.

Issue 126 is not officially resolved.  It should also be removed from that list.

Prasad will incorporate issues 43 and 44.  He has the pen.

Alex will then incorporate 34.  Prasad will pass him the pen, hopefully by the weekend.  T

here may be a minor clarification needed on whether the reference-schema attribute is required.

We need to put this on the TC call agenda for next week.  But Alex will go ahead and make the

minor change needed later if the TC decides to make this attribute optional

(it is currently required).

Prasad will also scan the BP-I inconsistencies reported by Kevin relative to the resolution

of issue 128.  Paco, if you can also take a look that would be great.

Assuming everyone agrees with Kevin's list of BP-I fixes, Kevin should incorporate them

as the resolution for 128.  Kevin, can you take the pen after Alex?

Yaron has agreed to incorporate 84 but we will defer that until he feels ready.

Yaron mentioned 9 as a blocking problem -- I just looked at it and I do not believe it is a blocking issue.  We have mandated static analysis at various places in the spec in order to apply *syntactic* correctness rules that cannot be conveniently expressed in schema.  I see 84 as relating to those cases.  Yaron, if you disagree we need to discuss.

I will follow up on resolving the remaining aspects of Issue 10, and will incorporate 1 and 10

after Kevin is done.

Cheers,

Satish

________________________________________

From: Satish Thatte [mailto:satisht@microsoft.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:20 AM

To: Prasad Yendluri

Cc: bpel spec

Subject: RE: [wsbpel-spec-edit] call today 9:30 PDT

This is the list as Peter sees it.  Let us verify what is already done.

Thanks for offering to take three issues.  I am wondering if 10 should be deferred

until we have thought through the "reentrancy" aspects.

Let us discuss in a few minutes.

________________________________________

From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:pyendluri@webmethods.com]

Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 9:10 AM

To: Satish Thatte

Cc: bpel spec

Subject: Re: [wsbpel-spec-edit] call today 9:30 PDT

To save some time on the call, I thought I would volunteer to take some of the issues.

Looking through the issues, I believe Alex already took care of 37, 75, 94 and 114.

Also I guess we already applied 105 sometime back (though we just closed the issue at SFO f2f).

That leaves 1, 10, 34, 43, 44, 84, 126 and 128.

Working top down and leaving issues that are better handled by others, I can do 10,43 and 44.

Thanks, Prasad

------- Original Message --------

Subject: [wsbpel-spec-edit] call today 9:30 PDT

Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 08:26:32 -0700

From: Satish Thatte <satisht@microsoft.com>

To: bpel spec <wsbpel-spec-edit@lists.oasis-open.org>

Sorry about being tardy with this.  I have been swamped - vacations have

evil consequences.  We have a lot of issues to incorporate.  Once we

finish with this we are charged with producing a clean draft.  The focus

today should be on making a schedule for the resolved issues (list

below).  I realize that there is unfinished technical resolution

business related to Issue 10.

Satish

Issue 1

Permeability of scopes

Issue 10

Serialization of compensation

Issue 34

Dependency on Proprietary Specifications

Issue 37

Initiating Correlation Set More Than Once

Issue 43

Setting up Periodic Alarms

Issue 44

portType is duplicated on Invoke activity and partnerLinkType

Issue 75

Locally Scoped partnerLink declarations

Issue 84

Require Static Analysis Description & List

Issue 94

Allow both "compensate" and other activities in compensation or fault

handler

Issue 105

XML namespaces used in spec and examples need to be defined

Issue 114

Multiple Correlation Sets

Issue 126

Event Handlers with local partnerLinks & Correlation Sets

Issue 128

WS-I BP Incompatible WSDL Import

wsbpel-spec-edit message